Skip to Content
TheCornerLabs Docs
DocsDatabaseGrokking Database Fundamentals for Tech InterviewsIntroduction to Database SystemsRelational Vs. Non Relational Databases

Understanding various database models is fundamental to designing efficient, scalable, and robust database systems. This lesson explores the differences between relational and non-relational models.

1734437443380069 Image scaled to 70%

Relational Models

Introduced by E.F. Codd in 1970, the relational model organizes data into tables (also known as relations) consisting of rows and columns.

  • Tables: Each table represents an entity, with rows representing individual records and columns representing attributes of the entity.
  • Keys: Primary keys uniquely identify each record, while foreign keys establish relationships between tables.

Characteristics

  • Structured Schema: Enforces a predefined schema, ensuring data consistency and integrity.
  • ACID Compliance: Guarantees Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, and Durability for transactions.
  • SQL Support: Utilizes Structured Query Language (SQL) for data manipulation and querying.

Advantages

  • Data Integrity: Strong enforcement of data constraints ensures accuracy and reliability.
  • Flexibility in Querying: Powerful SQL capabilities allow complex queries and data manipulations.
  • Standardization: Widely adopted standards facilitate interoperability between different DBMSs.

Disadvantages

  • Scalability Limitations: Vertical scaling (enhancing a single server) can be costly and has physical limits.
  • Rigid Schema: Adapting to changing data requirements may require significant schema modifications.
  • Performance Overheads: Complex joins and transactions can lead to performance bottlenecks in large-scale applications.

Examples

  • Oracle Database
  • Microsoft SQL Server
  • MySQL
  • PostgreSQL

Non-Relational Models (NoSQL)

Non-relational databases, often referred to as NoSQL (Not Only SQL) databases, provide flexible data models designed to handle unstructured or semi-structured data, high scalability, and distributed data storage.

Types of NoSQL Databases

  1. Document Stores

    • Structure: Store data in documents, typically using JSON, BSON, or XML formats.
    • Flexibility: Schema-less design allows varying data structures within the same collection.
    • Use Cases: Content management systems, real-time analytics.
    • Examples: MongoDB, CouchDB
  2. Key-Value Stores

    • Structure: Store data as simple key-value pairs.
    • Simplicity: Highly efficient for read/write operations where the key is known.
    • Use Cases: Session management, caching, real-time data feeds.
    • Examples: Redis, Riak, Amazon DynamoDB
  3. Column-Family Stores

    • Structure: Organize data into columns grouped into families, allowing storage of large volumes of data.
    • Scalability: Designed for high write and read throughput across distributed systems.
    • Use Cases: Time-series data, big data applications.
    • Examples: Apache Cassandra, HBase
  4. Graph Databases

    • Structure: Use graph structures with nodes, edges, and properties to represent and store data.
    • Flexibility: Excellent for handling complex relationships and interconnected data.
    • Use Cases: Social networks, recommendation engines, fraud detection.
    • Examples: Neo4j, Amazon Neptune

Characteristics

  • Flexible Schema: Allows dynamic data models that can evolve with application requirements.
  • Horizontal Scalability: Easily scales out across multiple servers or clusters.
  • Eventual Consistency: Many NoSQL systems prioritize availability and partition tolerance, offering eventual consistency over strict ACID compliance.

Advantages

  • Scalability: Optimized for distributed environments, handling large-scale data efficiently.
  • Performance: Tailored for specific use cases, offering high performance for targeted operations.
  • Flexibility: Accommodates diverse and evolving data structures without significant schema changes.

Disadvantages

  • Limited Standardization: Lack of universal query languages can lead to complexity in querying and integration.
  • Eventual Consistency: May not be suitable for applications requiring immediate consistency.
  • Complexity in Transactions: Handling complex transactions and ensuring data integrity can be challenging.

Examples

  • MongoDB (Document Store)
  • Redis (Key-Value Store)
  • Cassandra (Column-Family Store)
  • Neo4j (Graph Database)

Comparison: Relational vs. Non-Relational Models

FeatureRelational DatabasesNon-Relational Databases (NoSQL)
SchemaFixed and predefinedFlexible and dynamic
ScalabilityVertical scalingHorizontal scaling
Data IntegrityStrong ACID complianceVaries; often eventual consistency
Query LanguageSQLVaries (e.g., MongoDB uses MongoQL)
Data RelationshipsComplex joins and relationshipsOptimized for specific relationship types
Use CasesTransactional systems, ERP, CRMBig data, real-time analytics, IoT
ExamplesMySQL, PostgreSQL, OracleMongoDB, Cassandra, Redis, Neo4j
Last updated on